Jellyverse Docs
WebsiteApp
English
English
  • Overview
    • How to Connect to SEI
    • How to get SEI Devnet Funds
    • How to make your first Swap
  • Protocol Library
    • JellySwap
      • Liquidity Management
        • Swaps
      • Pools
        • Weighted Pools
        • Stable Pools
          • Composable Stable Pools
        • Setting up a Pool Configuration
      • Impermanent Loss
        • 50/50 Pools
        • 80/20 Pools
        • Multitoken Pools
      • Preminted JPT
      • Relayers
      • Smart Order Router (SOR)
    • JellyStake
      • Staking Chests
      • Voting power
    • jAssets by BLKSWN
      • Liquidation and the Stability Pool
      • Liquidation Logic
      • Recovery Mode
      • jUSD Redemption
      • Expected User Behaviors
      • Core Smart Contracts
      • PriceFeed and Oracle
      • Contract Ownership and Function Permissions
      • Keeping a sorted list of Vaults ordered by LACR
      • Supplying Hints to Vault operations
      • Gas compensation
      • The Stability Pool
      • Swap Pools
      • Protocol System Fees
      • Governance
      • Audits
  • Jellyverse Architecture
    • Governance
    • Rewards
    • Reward Distributor
    • Tokenomics
    • Whitepaper
    • Contract Addresses
  • Audit
  • Community
    • Socials
  • COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS
    • Introduction
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Protocol Library
  2. JellySwap
  3. Impermanent Loss

Multitoken Pools

Impermanent Loss Dynamics of Multitoken Pools

Unique Offering of JellySwap:

JellySwap’s ability to support multiple tokens within a single pool sets it apart from traditional AMMs. This adds layers of complexity but also presents unique opportunities for liquidity providers.

The Dynamics of a Multi-Token Pool:

Multi-token pools contain more than two tokens, and in the context of this example, we’re examining a pool with both stable and volatile assets. The pool consists of USDC, wBTC, JLY, and wETH.

Diving Into the Example:

  • Initial Assumptions: We begin with an even distribution of $10,000 across the four tokens.

  • Price Movements: Over time, USDC retains its pegged value, JLY sees a 15% uptick, wBTC drops by 4%, while WETH rises by 50%.

  • Impermanent Loss Dynamics: The inclusion of USDC, a stablecoin, makes the pool susceptible to impermanent loss. This is because while the value of USDC remains constant, the other assets in the pool are experiencing fluctuations. As a result, the relative proportions of the assets in the pool will change, leading to impermanent loss.

Understanding the Strategy for Liquidity Providers:

Liquidity providers in such pools are essentially betting on the expected volatility of the included assets. By choosing to join such pools:

  1. Volatility Farming: The LPs are capitalizing on the frequent price fluctuations to earn swap fees. More volatility typically translates to more swaps and hence, more fees.

  2. Impermanent Loss Management: They understand the inherent impermanent loss, especially due to the presence of a stablecoin. But, as long as the volatile assets return to their initial prices or move in a manner that balances the overall pool value, the impermanent loss will revert.

  3. Portfolio Diversification: Being part of such a pool allows LPs to diversify their holdings and reduce exposure to any single asset.

The End Goal for LPs:

For liquidity providers in a multi-token pool, the strategy often revolves around maximizing swap fee returns while managing and understanding the impermanent loss risks. The perfect scenario is a pool where the overall value sees a lot of fluctuations (leading to swaps and fees) but ends up where it started, thus nullifying any impermanent loss.

In conclusion, while multi-token pools offer new avenues for liquidity providers, they also necessitate a deeper understanding of the assets involved and the overall market dynamics. Balancing between swap fee returns and potential impermanent loss becomes the key to success in these pools.

Last updated 1 year ago